<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frequency of grammatical disjuncts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainwave.opencog.org/2009/07/06/frequency-of-grammatical-disjuncts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainwave.opencog.org/2009/07/06/frequency-of-grammatical-disjuncts/</link>
	<description>The first ultraintelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make. -I. J. Good, 1965</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: linasv</title>
		<link>http://brainwave.opencog.org/2009/07/06/frequency-of-grammatical-disjuncts/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>linasv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opencog.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Martin Reynaert wrote to say:  &#039;&#039;&lt;em&gt;From what I have learned from the work of mainly Ramon Ferrer i Cancho ( http://www.lsi.upc.edu/~rferrericancho/publications_by_year.html ), I would say that adding syntactic patterns to the words turns the natural language into more formal language. For more formal language a power law exponent well above 1 is `natural&#039;.&lt;/em&gt;&#039;&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin Reynaert wrote to say:  &#8221;<em>From what I have learned from the work of mainly Ramon Ferrer i Cancho ( <a href="http://www.lsi.upc.edu/~rferrericancho/publications_by_year.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lsi.upc.edu/~rferrericancho/publications_by_year.html</a> ), I would say that adding syntactic patterns to the words turns the natural language into more formal language. For more formal language a power law exponent well above 1 is `natural&#8217;.</em>&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ftyers</title>
		<link>http://brainwave.opencog.org/2009/07/06/frequency-of-grammatical-disjuncts/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>ftyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opencog.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Two comments really... the first is that perhaps the &quot;resisting the use of formulaic sentences&quot; comes from using more formal text as opposed to e.g. speech or chat type text. When I write for Wikipedia, I often find myself re-wording sentences. 

The second is, have you considered trying the same with the Persian Link grammar ? [1]

1. http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~jonsafari/#projects</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two comments really&#8230; the first is that perhaps the &#8220;resisting the use of formulaic sentences&#8221; comes from using more formal text as opposed to e.g. speech or chat type text. When I write for Wikipedia, I often find myself re-wording sentences. </p>
<p>The second is, have you considered trying the same with the Persian Link grammar ? [1]</p>
<p>1. <a href="http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~jonsafari/#projects" rel="nofollow">http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~jonsafari/#projects</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
